S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with SLP for majority of the session. O: Noah first participated in an alphabet identification task, identifying letters A-L. Letters were first reviewed, then identified in a field of 3. Noah identified the letters provided with 80% accuracy. Noah was then asked to label the category of 3 items provided given no field of answer choices. He completed the activity with 80% accuracy. After, he was asked what does not belong in a group of 4 items. He completed the task with 70% accuracy. Lastly, Noah was probed with a variety of sight words then was asked to match the sight word modeled given a field of 4 sight word answer choices. He completed the activity with 80% accuracy. A: Noah displays consistency/increases across all goals. P: Continue POC.

S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with SLP for majority of the session. O: Noah first participated in an alphabet identification task, identifying letters A-I. Letters were first reviewed, then identified in increasing field sizes. Noah identified the letters provided with 81% accuracy. Noah was then asked to label the category of 3 items provided given no field of answer choices. He completed the activity with 70% accuracy. After, he was asked what does not belong in a group of 4 items. He completed the task with 60% accuracy. Lastly, Noah was asked to blend 3 letter words when given the 3 sounds verbally. He completed the task with 72% accuracy. A: Noah displays increases across all goals. P: Continue POC.

S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah had woken up from a nap right before the session. He was engaged throughout the session, but it is noted that he was slower to complete tasks. O: Noah was first asked to match the sight word modeled in a field of 14 sight words. He completed the activity with 93% accuracy. Next, he was asked to find both the uppercase and lowercase of the letters “A,” “B,” and “C” on three worksheets with mixed letters and a model at the top. He completed the activity with verbal prompts to refer to the model with 80% accuracy for the letter “A” and 80% and 100% accuracy for the letters “B” and “C” respectively. This gives an overall average of 86% accuracy. Lastly, Noah was asked to blend 3 letter words when given the 3 sounds verbally. He completed the task with 63% accuracy. A: Noah displays increases across all goals. Blending activity noted to be discontinued early due to Noah getting soap in eyes after washing his hands. P: Continue POC.

S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with SLP for majority of the session. O: Noah was first asked to label the category of 3 items provided without a field of answer choices. He completed the activity with 80% accuracy. Next, he was asked what does not belong in a group of 4 items. He completed the task with 50% accuracy. After, Noah participated in an alphabet identification task, identifying letters A-I. Letters were first reviewed, then identified in a field of 3 letters. Noah identified letters A-C with 100% accuracy, D-F with 89% accuracy, and G-I with 89% accuracy. Averages across letter groups give an overall accuracy of 93%. Lastly, Noah completed a pronoun labeling activity where he was provided picture scenes and asked to choose the correct pronoun in a field of 3. He completed the activity with 70% accuracy. A: Noah displays increases across most goals. Decrease on “what does not belong” activity likely due to increased difficulty of task. P: Continue POC.

S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with SLP for majority of the session. Some task refusal noted. O: Noah was first read a story aloud and asked mixed “wh” questions throughout. Noah completed the task with 71% accuracy. Next, Noah asked to complete a letter identification exercise with the letters A-I. Letters were first reviewed, then identified in a field of 3 letters. Noah identified letters A-C with 100% accuracy, D-F with 67% accuracy, and G-I (newly introduced) with 100% accuracy. Averages across letter groups give an overall accuracy of 89%. Lastly, Noah was probed with a variety of sight words then was asked to match the sight word modeled given a field of 3 sight word answer choices. He completed the activity with 83% accuracy. A: Noah displays increases across goals. P: Continue POC.

S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with SLP for majority of the session. Increased distractibility noted during some activities. O: Noah was first asked to label the category of 3 items provided given no field of answer choices. He completed the activity with 60% accuracy. After, Noah asked to complete a letter identification exercise with the letters A-F. Letters were first reviewed, then identified in varying field sizes up to 3. Noah completed the activity with 68% accuracy. Next, Noah was probed with a variety of sight words then was asked to match the sight word provided given a field of 4 sight word answer choices. He completed the activity with 70% accuracy. Then, he was asked what does not belong in a group of 4 items. He completed the task with 70% accuracy. Lastly, Noah was asked to blend 3 letter words when given the 3 sounds verbally. He completed the task with 62% accuracy. A: Noah displays increases as well as decreases across goals. Decreases could be attributed to break between sessions due to spring break and/or increased level of distractibility during tasks. P: Continue POC.

S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with SLP for majority of the session. Increased distractibility noted. O: Noah was first asked what belongs in a category given the category verbally and a field of 4 picture answer choices. He completed the activity with 80% accuracy. He was then asked to label the category given a field of 4 pictures. He completed the activity with 70% accuracy. After, Noah asked to complete a letter identification exercise with the letters A-F. Letters were first reviewed, then identified in varying field sizes up to 3. Noah completed the activity with 64% accuracy. Next, Noah was probed with a variety of sight words then was asked to match the sight word provided given a field of 4 sight word answer choices. He completed the activity with 95% accuracy. Lastly, he was asked to blend 3 letter words when given the 3 sounds verbally. He completed the task with 75% accuracy. A: Noah displays consistency/progress across goals. Decreases displayed when activities increase in difficulty (e.g. letter identification given more letter options). P: Continue POC.

S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with SLP for majority of the session. Some distractibility noted. O: Noah was first asked to sort items provided into different categories provided (e.g. apple would be put under the fruit category). He completed the activity with 75% accuracy. He was then asked to label the category given a field of 4 pictures. He completed the activity with 60% accuracy. After, Noah was asked to complete a letter identification exercise with the letters A-C. Letters were first reviewed, then identified in varying field sizes up to 3. Noah completed the activity with 65% accuracy. Next, Noah was probed with a variety of sight words then was asked to match the sight word provided given a field of 4 sight word answer choices. He completed the activity with 80% accuracy. Lastly, he was asked to blend 3 letter words when given the 3 sounds verbally. He completed the task with 50% accuracy. A: Noah displays consistency/progress across goals. Decreases displayed when Noah was noted to be distracted. P: Continue POC.

S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with SLP for majority of the session. Some distractibility noted. O: Noah was first asked to sort items provided into different categories provided (e.g. apple would be put under the fruit category). He completed the activity with 88% accuracy. He was then asked name the category given 4 common item pictures. He completed the task with 60% accuracy. Noah was then asked to identify the superlative (e.g. big, bigger, biggest) in a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 70% accuracy. After, Noah was probed with 3 sight words (“a,” “to,” “the”) and asked to identify the word provided verbally in a field of 3. He completed the activity with 33% accuracy. Lastly, Noah was asked to find the letter “A” on a sheet with mixed letters and a model at the top. He completed the activity with verbal prompts to refer to the model with 70% accuracy. A: Noah displays consistency/progress across goals. P: Continue POC.

S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with SLP for majority of the session. Some distractibility noted. O: Noah was first asked to sort items provided into different category spaces of where one would find them (e.g. household items; where in the house they would be found). He completed the activity with 70% accuracy. He was then asked to blend 3 letter words when given the 3 sounds verbally. He completed the task correctly in 4 out of 5 opportunities. Noah was then asked to identify the superlative (e.g. big, bigger, biggest) in a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 70% accuracy. After, Noah was probed with 3 sight words (“a,” “to,” “the”). Lastly, Noah was asked to find the letters “A” and “B” on sheets with mixed letters and a model at the top. He completed the activity with verbal prompts to refer to the model with 70% and 40% accuracy respectively. A: Noah displays progress across goals. P: Continue POC.