Richard had a good session. Started off with conversational practice with a peer. He was working on TH during this conversation. Next Richard was asked to read a list of 10 words that had multiple meanings and then match the word to two definitions. This was difficult. Richard was not thrilled to work on his reading but he did it! This helped him when it came time to match the words to their meanings. Will continue this exercise during sessions tomorrow.
Richard had a great session today. He worked on a reading comprehension passage (clinician read) that discussed fact v opinion. This was a little tricky today. After a couple of examples, Richard started to get the idea of what makes a fact vs an opinion. 2/5.
Richard then did 3 story comprehension questions about cause and effect. He did an excellent job with this comprehension exercise. he was 95% accurate with minimal cues.
Luke had a great session yesterday. He maintained his L sound with 85% accuracy given minimal cues. He also worked on synonyms. He was read a sentence and then asked to provide a word that means the same thing as the highlighted word. Luke did a great job with this. Lastly, he was read a short story and asked comprehension questions- 4/5.
Jack had a great session today. He worked on R sounds today. He worked on vocalic R - OR, AR, IRE, and ER in single words. He was ~75% accurate with moderate cues. Initial R in short phrases with 80% accuracy given minimal cues.
Richard had a great session. He worked on TH in the initial, medial and final positions of words. He put the words in short grammatically correct sentences with minimal cues ~85% accuracy.
Chris was highly motivated once again this morning. Sharing ideas for storylines within his upcoming video productions and comic books continues to provide a strong springboard for conversational reciprocity, linguistic organization and narrative development. Chris was eager to share a multitude of ideas related to multiple "projects." Attention was strong this session, and the provision of familiar scaffolding strategies facilitated increased cohesiveness and organization. Speaker -speaker overlap was noted to be frequent this session, however, allowance for repair was noted 80% of the time. Chris was noted to utilize both question and comment within conversation this morning. A notable increase in use of contingent questions was observed. Chris demonstrated strong use of comparisons, as well as use of inferences within narrative generation. Strong session today.
The session commenced this morning with Chris rapidly posing multiple questions, and seeking feedback regarding one of his upcoming video productions. Familiar scaffolding supports were provided and Chris successfully utilized topic transition phrases and cohesive ties for the duration of the session. Acknowledgement of "requests for clarification" when details within the specific topic were not "shared knowledge" was noted. However, cues and supports to assist with clarification, and vocabulary specificity were needed. Attentional shifting was noted today, and self awareness was strong, as Chris shared that "my head is jumpy today." Strong session overall as Chris continues to make solid gains.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with the SLP throughout the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 20% accuracy. He was then given a picture scene and asked mixed “wh” questions about the picture. He answered the questions with 30% accuracy. After, Noah was asked a variety of “wh” questions about a short passage read to him, given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 25% accuracy. Noah was then asked to identify spatial concepts in a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activities with 30% accuracy. Lastly, Noah was asked to identify where an object was using spatial prepositions (behind, in front of, next to, under) given an initial model. He completed the activity with 10% accuracy. A: Noah benefitted from increased prompting throughout tasks. Baselines obtained for majority of POC goals. P: Complete baseline data collection on updated POC goals. Continue POC based on baselines obtained.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah had some difficulty with transitioning to session, but he was eager to work with the SLP for the duration of the session. Evaluation results and updated plan of care was given to Michael, Noah’s babysitter, as well as put on file at the Batt School. O: New plan of care goals were probed and initial baseline data taken. Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 20% accuracy. He was then given a picture scene and asked mixed “wh” questions about the picture. He answered the questions with 25% accuracy. After, Noah was asked a variety of “wh” questions about a short passage read to him, given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 15% accuracy. Lastly, Noah asked to identify quantitative and spatial concepts, in fields of 3 visual answer choices and 2 visual answer choices respectively. He completed the activities with 25% accuracy and 20% accuracy respectively. A: Noah benefitted from increased prompting throughout tasks. Initial baseline data collected. P: Continue collecting baseline data on updated POC goals.
