S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. He was eager to work with the SLP throughout most of the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-step directions, as well as a variety of 2-step directions. He completed the activities with 67% and 50% accuracy respectively. Noah was then asked to sequence 3 visuals of common activities (i.e. making hot chocolate). He completed the activity with 78% accuracy. After, Noah answered mixed “wh” questions about an activity completed given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 58% accuracy. Lastly, he was asked to identify spatial concepts shown in a picture provided. He completed the activity with 63% accuracy independently. A: Increases displayed across most POC goals. Some decreases on tasks such as “wh” questions likely due to decreased compliance and break between sessions (i.e. week off for Thanksgiving). P: Continue with current POC. Monitor goals displaying decreases.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. He was eager to work with the SLP throughout the session. Cooking activity (making turkey cookies) assisted in taking naturalistic data for following directions as well as answering “wh” questions. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 68% accuracy. Noah was then asked mixed “wh” questions about an activity completed given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 86% accuracy. He was then asked to identify spatial concepts given verbal cues as needed. He completed the activity with 78% accuracy. Lastly, Noah sequenced pictures of common tasks/activities with 35% accuracy given verbal cueing. A: Increases displayed across POC goals. Sequencing probe continued with decrease displayed. P: Continue with current POC. Continue to probe sequencing for an additional session to establish baseline.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. He was eager to work with the SLP throughout the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 66% accuracy. He was then asked to identify temporal concepts (i.e. before/after) in a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 68% accuracy. He was then asked to identify spatial concepts given verbal cues as needed. He completed the activity with 77% accuracy. After, Noah sequenced pictures of common tasks/activities with 40% accuracy given verbal cueing. Lastly, Noah was asked mixed “wh” questions about a story read aloud to him given a field of 2 visual answer choices and immediate visual/verbal information. He completed the activity with 85% accuracy. A: Increases displayed across POC goals. Sequencing goal probed. P: Continue with current POC. Continue to probe sequencing.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. He was eager to work with the SLP throughout the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-step related directions. He completed the activity with 65% accuracy. He was then asked to identify temporal concepts (i.e. before/after) in a field of 3 visual answer choices. He was then asked to identify spatial concepts in a field of 2 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 75% accuracy. Lastly, Noah was asked mixed “wh” questions about a story read aloud to him given a field of 3 visual answer choices and immediate visual/verbal information. He completed the activity with 77% accuracy. A: Increases displayed across POC goals. Noah is noted to show increases with answering “wh” questions after being provided immediate visual/verbal information. P: Continue with current POC.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah had some difficulty with transitioning into speech. Increased time to transition and increased play noted to assist with compliance level. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-step related directions. He completed the activity with 60% accuracy. He was then asked to identify temporal concepts (i.e. before/after) in a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 35% accuracy. Noah was then asked to follow 2-step related directions. He completed the activity with 40% accuracy. Lastly, Noah identified quantitative concepts (i.e. all/one) in a field of 2 answer choices. He completed the activity with 60% accuracy. A: Consistent progress noted across POC goals. P: Continue with current POC.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah had some difficulty with transitioning into speech but is noted to have recovered quickly. Decreased compliance is also noted as the session progressed. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 45% accuracy. He was then asked to identify spatial concepts in a field of 2 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 42% accuracy. Lastly, Noah was asked mixed “wh” questions about a story read aloud to him given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 20% accuracy. A: Decreases noted on some targeted POC goals, likely due to decreased compliance and high level of distractibility as session progressed. P: Continue with current POC; monitor goals that display decreases.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with the SLP throughout the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-step related directions. He completed the activity with 45% accuracy. He was then asked to identify spatial concepts in a field of 2 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 40% accuracy. Noah was then given a picture scene and asked mixed “wh” questions about the picture. He answered the questions with 45% accuracy. Lastly, Noah was also asked mixed “wh” questions about short passages read aloud to him given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 40% accuracy. A: Noah progress/consistency across POC goals. P: Continue with current POC.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with the SLP throughout the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 30% accuracy. He was then asked to identify spatial concepts in a field of 2 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 40% accuracy. Noah was then given a picture scene and asked mixed “wh” questions about the picture. He answered the questions with 45% accuracy. He was also asked mixed “wh” questions about short passages read aloud to him given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 63% accuracy. Lastly, Noah completed quantitative concepts activity in which he had to identify most/least in a field of 3 visual answer choices given initial model and fading cues as needed. He completed the activity with 35% accuracy. A: Noah displays increases across POC goals. P: Continue with current POC.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with the SLP throughout the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 25% accuracy. He was then asked to identify quantitative and spatial concepts, in fields of 3 visual answer choices. He completed both activities with 30% accuracy on each activity. Noah was then asked to identify where an object was using spatial prepositions (behind, in front of, next to, under) given an initial model. He completed the activity with 25% accuracy. Lastly, Noah was given a picture scene and asked mixed “wh” questions about the picture. He answered the questions with 35% accuracy. A: Noah benefitted from redirection to task throughout session. Data consistent with baselines obtained P: Continue with current POC.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. Noah was eager to work with the SLP throughout the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 25% accuracy. He was then given a picture scene and asked mixed “wh” questions about the picture. He answered the questions with 35% accuracy. Noah was then asked to identify quantitative and spatial concepts, in fields of 3 visual answer choices and 2 visual answer choices respectively. He completed the activities with 30% accuracy and 25% accuracy respectively. Lastly, Noah was asked to identify where an object was using spatial prepositions (behind, in front of, next to, under) given an initial model. He completed the activity with 20% accuracy. A: Noah benefitted from increased prompting throughout tasks. Baselines obtained for all POC. P: Continue POC based on baselines obtained.
