S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. He had some difficulty with transitioning but was redirected quickly. After initial reservations, Noah was eager to work with the SLP for the duration of the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 70% accuracy. Noah was then asked to sequence 3 visuals of common activities (i.e. building a snowman) given visuals only. He completed the activity with 77% accuracy. After, Noah answered mixed “wh” questions about an activity completed given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 75% accuracy. Lastly, he was asked to identify spatial concepts in a field of 3 answer choices. He completed the activity with 67% accuracy. A: Increases and consistent data displayed across all POC goals. P: Continue with current POC.
Chris was quick to initiate conversation this morning following a fast "good morning." He was very much wanting to expand upon the topics and the discussion from Monday's session. Supports to allow for increased cycles of reciprocity, following both question and comment stimuli were provided as the session commenced. Chris was reflective, and periodically requested repetition of comments when speaker-speaker overlap was evident. He also requested additional review of "social thinking" strategies as navigating peer relationships at school continues to be the forefront of his mind. He shared that he was anxiously awaiting the outcome of today's conference.
The session closed with Chris expressing his gratitude for all of the time that we spend "talking about really important stuff," and for all of the "help" that has been given. Strong session today.
Luke had a good session today. He listened to stories outloud and predicted what would happen next in the story. In addition, he answered questions about what he knows about the story. He did a great job with this and sat at the table for the duration of the activity. Luke had some difficulties with understanding 'not.' For example, when asked what word does NOT describe a character he had difficulties being able to answer correctly.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. He was eager to work with the SLP throughout the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 70% accuracy. Noah was then asked to sequence 3 visuals of common activities (i.e. baking cookies) given visuals only. He completed the activity with 72% accuracy. After, Noah answered mixed “wh” questions about an activity completed given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 75% accuracy. Then, he was asked to identify quantitative concepts (i.e. all/none, one/all) in a field of 2 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 75% accuracy. Lastly, he was asked to identify spatial concepts in a field of 3 answer choices. He completed the activity with 64% accuracy. A: Increases displayed across all POC goals. P: Continue with current POC.
Luke had a good session today. It took him a little while to get himself ready to learn but when he did he did an excellent job. He worked on sequencing. He read 2 stories and then used pictures to independently sequence them. He worked on L in all word positions in conversation with 85% accuracy, minimal cues given.
Chris was eager to meet this morning, as he once again had a great deal of "things to talk about." He was clearly internally distracted, and rapidly initiated conversation, wanting to share his thoughts across a variety of topics. Scaffolding supports allowed for a linear progression across topics and use of topic transition phrases. Focus of conversation allowed for review of strategies from the "Social Thinking" literature, as well as the concepts of perspective taking, and presupposition. Aspects of peer dynamics relating to both "on-line" interactions as well as "in person" interactions were at the basis for conversation during today's session. Self awareness, and review of the "zones of regulation" were once again highlighted. Reciprocity was supported with familiar cues as well. Morning break coincided with this morning's session, and Chris chose to remain in session, even after interruption from peers to join them outside. Chris was wanting to engage beyond our time allotted today as he was notably resonating with the strategies and support that was shared. Strong session.
Richard had a great session today. He worked hard! Richard provided definitions for 7/8 words with no cues. Language was the only word that he had a difficult time formulating a definition. Richard was given an alphabet and asked to circle which word in a field of 5 words was at the beginning of the alphabet, he did great! Richard was read a 7 paragraph story outloud and then answered questions about the story with 80% acccuracy. Lastly, Richard was given an activity to work on singular and plural nouns. He had difficulties with 'children' and 'men' but overall did an excellent job!
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. He was eager to work with the SLP at the beginning of the session. Decreased compliance noted as session continued. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-2 step related directions. He completed the activity with 67% accuracy. Noah was then asked to sequence 3 visuals of common activities (i.e. baking cookies). He completed the activity with 66% accuracy. After, Noah answered mixed “wh” questions about an activity completed given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 68% accuracy. Lastly, he was asked to identify spatial concepts in a field of 3 answer choices. He completed the activity with 61% accuracy. A: Both increases and decreases displayed across POC goals. Decreased compliance displayed as session progressed. P: Continue with current POC. Monitor goals displaying decreases.
S: Noah was seen at the Batt School for treatment. He was eager to work with the SLP throughout most of the session. O: Noah was asked to follow a variety of 1-step directions, as well as a variety of 2-step directions. He completed the activities with 67% and 50% accuracy respectively. Noah was then asked to sequence 3 visuals of common activities (i.e. making hot chocolate). He completed the activity with 78% accuracy. After, Noah answered mixed “wh” questions about an activity completed given a field of 3 visual answer choices. He completed the activity with 58% accuracy. Lastly, he was asked to identify spatial concepts shown in a picture provided. He completed the activity with 63% accuracy independently. A: Increases displayed across most POC goals. Some decreases on tasks such as “wh” questions likely due to decreased compliance and break between sessions (i.e. week off for Thanksgiving). P: Continue with current POC. Monitor goals displaying decreases.
